Tim Wang's eLearning Blog

10/29/08

The Empire Strikes Back - Microsoft Against Piracy in China

Filed under: Open Source, Microsoft — timwang @ 06:27:51 pm

Microsoft launched the WGA (Windows Genuine Advantage) and OGA (Office Genuine Advantage) tools this month to examine the legitimacy of the MS Windows and MS Office software on all PCs in China. Those who failed the tests would see a black desktop on their Windows background or a permanent warning message of pirated Office software. This is yet the most harsh action taken by the software giant against software piracy in China.

Microsoft WGA OGA resets desktop to black in China

Although the company repeated it would not collect personal information with the tools, which would not affect computer use, controversy over the move has escalated. Many Chinese users have questioned the legality of Microsoft's move. A question on many Chinese consumers' mind: Does Microsoft have the right to penalize pirated systems by intruding the system without permission of the computer owner? There have been several law suits filed against Microsoft based on their WGA and OGA movement in China since October 20th. I personally do think the act has breached the basic ethics of software manufacturers with the unsolicited remote control of computers. I don't believe any software companies would dare to this kind of "certification based penalization" here in Canada or US. In the meanwhile, I do support software developers to take legitimate legal actions against piracy.


Journey Education

Comments:

Comment from: opinionated [Visitor]
I don't like the idea at all, but let's look past the retoric of Microsoft invading peoples machines.
These are machines that have pirated versions of Microsoft software on them, that the users then connect to the Microsoft servers to upgrade, using Microsoft bandwidth and CPU power to upgrade. MS isn't calling out to these machines to install stuff on it - the users are calling out to MS to ask for upgrades to their pirated software. I feel MS is justified in doing this and isn't, really, invading anything. The users are asking for this upgrade by connecting for the upgrades - if they don't like it, don't allow the computer to connect to MS.
The main scary part here is: what if they've coded the checks wrong and it starts impacting non-pirated software? That's where the real concern should lie...
PermalinkPermalink 10/30/08 @ 10:51
Comment from: timwang [Member] Email · http://blog.loaz.com/timwang
Good point. I am not familiar with the upgrade requirement of Microsoft, but it seems often a user "must" upgrade their Microsoft software. I am thinking about Windows XP SP1, SP2 then SP3? Another word, if the upgrade is previously coded as a "must-do procedure", then it's not much of the users' choice of weather or not to user MS's bandwidth...
PermalinkPermalink 10/30/08 @ 23:48

This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

hosted by Learning Object Authoring Zone | Learn Mandarin Chinese the Simple Way